CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: thesupportcentre@lawsociety.org.uk
cc: vince.maple@medway.gov.uk
date: 10 Aug 2023, 07:29
subject: Fwd: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
The Law Society
Dear Sirs
The three law firms that you gave me details of as possibilities for seeking legal advice and representation in the following matter at the Court of Appeal did not respond to me, so I am still without representation. Vince Maple, the Leader of Medway Council has also not responded to my concerns on employment at Electoral Services Medway Council so that there is something very fishy going on: ToVinceMaple(LeaderMedwayCouncil(APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES)4Aug2023.docx, and he may be required to give evidence consequently when the matter is heard in Court.
I need a lawyer, possibly a barrister, to assist me in attending the Hearing that is yet to be announced, if at all. Perhaps I have gone about it in the wrong way being a novice in legal matters and do not know the procedures or mechanisms.
Can you search your data records and point me in the right direction to find a suitable lawyer?
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 16:50
Subject: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
To: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
To
The Court of Appeal
For due action by Master Bancroft-Rimmer
Your Honour
My lawyers Olives Solicitors have been usurped and manipulated by agents of the State unknown acting from behind the scenes to draw them into a criminal conspiracy against me as evident from the fact that no reply was received to the communication linked here: CONSULTATION ON CA-2023-000750 (COURT OF APPEAL) (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/consultation-on-ca-2023-000750-court-of-appeal
An attempt by me to have the dispute resolved through Professional Standards Department of Kent Police and the independent Office for Police Conduct also met with dead silence, as linked here: Complaint Resolution (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/complaint-resolution
Your Honour, I had circulated your decision endorsing the direction of jurisdiction lawyer Levey at the Court of Appeal widely but no State authority was willing to reply; see link here: Fw: Failure Notice: reported to the Attorney General (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/fw-failure-notice-reported-to-the-attorney-general.
This brings me to the email that you sent me yesterday as attached here: FrCivilAppealsRegistry(CourtofAppeal)8Aug2023.docx in which your Honour seemed to agree that if the results of the proceedings that I have litigated on and in turn being arrested for as a suspect in alleged malicious communications and stalking offences were not to my satisfaction as just, you would list a Hearing at the Court of Appeal of all significant parties to the dispute.
I plead with you that this Hearing must be held without delay as a matter of priority as no other Court can consider the matters that have been raised.
Please acknowledge this email for legal purposes.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
2
Attachments
• Scanned by Gmail
(a) ToVinceMaple(LeaderMedwayCouncil(APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES)4Aug2023.docx
(b) FrCivilAppealsRegistry(CourtofAppeal)8Aug2023.docx :
(a)
APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: vince.maple@medway.gov.uk
date: 4 Aug 2023, 11:58
subject: APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
Cllr Vince Maple (Chatham Central and Brompton)
Leader of the Medway Council and the Labour and Co-operative Group
Email: vince.maple@medway.gov.uk
Dear Cllr Vince Maple
My wife and I had been employed by Medway Council since 2005 to assist as Count Officers in general elections, local elections and parish elections, Police and Crime Commissioner elections whenever these took place.
Unfortunately, my association in this regard was terminated by Jane Ringham two years ago as she misunderstood my emailed communications to the Council and her in particular and considered me to be in some way disrupting the work of the Council.
I am not a member of any particular bonafide political party at the national level but do have a budding knowledge and dissemination oriented group of which I am the single member that I call The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom. It is not registered with the Election Commission and will never be in my life time. I am 66 years of age.
I used to be a supporter of Labour Party under Sir Tony Blair, then I investigated the Liberal Democrats, UKIP ad the Conservative Party by becoming member of these political organisations, but now I do not wish to be a member of any bonafide political party. I wondered whether these associations with politics had anything to do with Jane Ringham terminating my employment at elections for Medway Council or what. I am just an investigative journalist reporting on everyting from politics, humanities and the environment. So I am very puzzled and disappointed.
I have always valued my work for Medway Council in the elections and we have lived here since 1991. I used to issue postal votes as well as work all night with my wife on the day of the election. Now my wife cannot work as we used to work as a team on the same table and she is reluctant to go out at night all by herself when she is now offered a role as Count Officer.
I dearly wish my employment in the Electoral Services of Medway Council to be restored, and in this regard if I have sent emailed communications to Jane Ringham that were seen as having been inappropriate conduct my myself, I sincerely apologise for what I did.
This is why I am writing to you well ahead of the next general election so that Jane Ringham could put me and my wife back on the list of those the Council needs and rely on to assist in elections.
Would you be so kind as to speak to Jane Ringham on my behalf and see if this representation through you as Leader of Medway Council is going to be duly considered?
I look forward to your response.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES
Inbox
from: Councillor Vince Maple <vince.maple@medway.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 4 Aug 2023, 11:58
subject: Automatic reply: APOLOGY TO MEDWAY COUNCIL ELECTORAL SERVICES
mailed-by: mx0.medway.gov.uk
Signed by: medway.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
Many thanks for your email - I am currently on leave until 8th August with very limited access to this account.
If this is an urgent Chatham Central & Brompton matter you may wish to contact Nina Gurung or Damola Animashaun.
Vince Maple
Leader of the Medway Labour and Co-operative Group
Chatham Central & Brompton Ward Councillor
01634332396
www.medwaylabour.org.uk
Twitter @vincemaple
This transmission is intended for the named addressee (s) only and may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately.
This email has been scanned for viruses and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that none are present. Medway Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of his email or attachments. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender and not necessarily those of Medway Council unless explicitly stated.
Please be aware that emails sent to or received from Medway Council may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
This transmission is intended for the named addresses only and may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee or authorised to receive it for the addressee you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. This email has been scanned for viruses and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that none are present. Medway Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender and not necessarily those of Medway Council unless explicitly stated. Please be aware that emails sent to or received from Medway Council may be subject to recording and monitoring
(b)
RE: our ref: CA-2023-000750 Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK
Yahoo
Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Tue, 8 Aug at 14:17
Dear Dr Panigrahi
Your email has been referred to Master Bancroft-Rimmer who has given the following direction.
“I refer to your emails of 18 July, 22 July and 26 July. The jurisdiction directions given on 18 July 2023 stand. The Court of Appeal does not have jurisdiction in relation to the orders that you seek to appeal.”
HM Courts & Tribunals Service logo
Mr Mo Chowdhury
Registry Manager
Civil Appeals Office, Room E307| HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| London| WC2A 2LL
Phone: 0207 947 6915
gov.uk/hmcts
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
Sent: 18 July 2023 17:09
To: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>; northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>; Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>; administrativecourtoffice.generaloffice@hmcts-service.x.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: RE: Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK our ref: CA-2023-000750
Your Honour
Thank you for your email.
I need more time to consider the proceedings under are that Court of Appeals above reference number than the 7 days that you have permitted because of the complexities inherent in the fact that the civil proceedings are highly dynamic in nature in the 10 November 2023 2 pm Trial Hearing at North Kent Magistrates Court, and that a Judicial Review proceedings is in place right now at the High Court under Case No/1620/2002.
Furthermore, Kent Police is currently considering whether to charge me with offences for allegedly Stalking, and sending malicious communications so the outcome of its consideration in terms of the several millions of pounds that I have demanded with an apology would have to be known before CA-2003-000750 is closed by the Court of Appeal notwithstanding the concerns stated by the jurisdiction lawyer Levey.
If these proceedings do not progress matters to a just resolution by 10 November 2023, the Court of Appeal will have jurisdiction to list a Hearing.
If the Court of Appeal disagrees, please let me know as soon as possible.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Appellant)
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 08967799619
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 14:13, Civil Appeals - Registry
<civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your papers were referred to theY Jurisdiction Lawyer Levey of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following:
I refer to the appellant’s notice filed by the applicant seeking permission to appeal various orders, including those of HHJ Parfitt and DJ Lightman. The date given in section 2 of the appellant’s notice is 15 April 2023.
No order dated 15 April 2023 has been provided. However, the following orders have been filed:
The order of HHJ Parfitt of 19 January 2021 - The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Circuit Judge sitting in the County Court (see article 5 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2016). An appeal lies instead to a High Court Judge. Furthermore, there is no right of appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal (see section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999).
The order of DJ Lightman dated 21 June 2021 - The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a decision of a District Judge. An appeal lies instead to a Circuit Judge, sitting in the County Court, pursuant to article 5(3) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2016.
Accordingly, this Court has no jurisdiction in respect to the orders filed.
Unless the applicant files an order in respect to which this Court does have jurisdiction within 7 days, this matter will be closed.
Kind Regards,
Mr Keith De Bordes
Civil Appeals Office| Room E308 | Royal Courts of Justice Strand | London | WC2A 2LL | DX 44456 Strand | Tel: 0207 947 7784 | Email: Civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk
gov.uk/hmcts
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Update:
At 10.51 am the Mobile Phone rang from a Spam caller dialling from 0800 090 3051.
My thoughts are that the State has acknowledged that this is the end of the saga. No harm done.
Truth accommodated, nonchalantly, spontaneously and unpremeditatedly on free flow of activities that all is now well as it has ended well.
I will certainly terminate the saga here for the matter is acknowledged as being in the Court of Appeal under CA-2023-000750 by this Spam call.
____________________________________________________________________
12.02 pm (UK-Time) 10 August 2023
Comments