top of page

Shantanu Panigrahii's Daily Bulletin

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Search

CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Writer's picture: Shantanu PanigrahiShantanu Panigrahi

CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Inbox

from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: Stripe <accounts@stripe.com>,

Stripe Support <support@stripe.com>

cc: Enquiries Medway County <enquiries.medway.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>,

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>,

Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>,

"KMPTPALS (KENT AND MEDWAY NHS AND SOCIAL CARE PARTNERSHIP TRUST)" <kmpt.pals.kmpt@nhs.net>,

Dr Sivaji Panesar <panesar@gmail.com>,

Maidstonecrowncourt <maidstonecrowncourt@justice.gov.uk>,

HOC Petitions Committee <petitionscommittee@parliament.uk>,

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:56

subject: Fwd: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

mailed-by: gmail.com


Dear Stripe


Following the failure to have this Dispute elicited at Medway County Court, Central London County Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, East Kent Magistrates Court, Medway Magistrates Court, Maidstone Crown Court, this morning I have considered that this matter is absolutely ripe and amenable to a Judicial Review which is what the Administrative Court of the Royal Courts of Justice is charged with the responsibility to conduct.


From my preliminary correspondence with the Administrative Court as set out below it is under a Case Progression state of proceedings, whereby I am required to produce a statement to the Court of what precisely should be Judicially Reviewed by the Justices.


My contention is that I have been victimised by an organisation allied to the University of Greenwich under the guise of calling itself 'Victim of Panigrahi Association' to brutalise and terrorise me and thwart my innocent quest to build a new life for myself and my family in the United Kingdom after being unceremoniously dismissed from service without the payment of my due entitlement to severance pay.


Over the past 4 years I worked Freelance from home to develop my concept of The Conservative Libertarian Society under my company 'The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited' and its political offshoot The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom (TCLP-UK) and Stripe was the lynch institution fronting the disruption of my business by placing it on a Restricted Access unable to recruit members directly by processing the payments to my business Account at Tide Bank. Stripe has given me no reason why it has taken this stance.


The House of Commons petition Committee especially changed my TCLP-UK Petition that was duly sponsored with 5 signatures into a completely watered down version that lost the substance and meaning of what we had envisaged.

The details of the terrorism inflicted on me are already in your possession but I attach another copy hereby: Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police).pdf.


A preliminary list of parties that are required to attend any Hearing announced by the Administrative Court are accordingly copied into this email but the final list will have to be announced by the Administrative Court Justices.


Should anyone copied into this email have any questions, I am available to provide further clarifications or an out of court settlement of the damages and compensation and apology package of £300 million.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


One attachment • Scanned by Gmail

Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police).pdf

Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police

This Claim is brought to the Medway County Court against Kent Police (and by extension the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and co-conspirators (officials in His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombudsman, Financial Services Ombudsman, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Independent Office for Police Conduct) on the following chargesheet against this Police Force:

(a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime by Phands and MI5/MI6: £250,000;

(b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter: £5,000;

(c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter: £1000;

(d) protecting criminals in University of Greenwich legalities matter - back pay

£30,000*26 years on 20 October 2022: £780,000;

(e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me: £1,000,000;

(f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter: £3,000;

(g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman, Financial Serviceman Ombudsman Solicitors Regulation Authority, from criminal activities against me with regard to numerous lawyers and Banks and the NHS that I complained: £200,000;

(h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason: £5,000,000;

(i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had lawfully absconded: £1,000,000;

(j) pointless prosecutions of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January 2017 and booking the Speed Awareness Course in October 2022: £1,000,000;

(k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court: £1,000,000;

(l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit

Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister: £1,000,000;

(m) protecting the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Conservative Prime Ministers including Mr Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak who obstructed and perverted the course of justice against the Claimant in Claim E35YM660 of the Central London County Court: £1,000, 000;

(n) protecting the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court for thwarting justice in Claim No Court Reference: OTP-CR-76/22: £100,000;

(o) protecting the Norway membership of the Security Council from bringing the submissions of the Claimant to the attention of the Security Council, the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Secretary General of the United Nations: £1,000,000;

(p) protecting Wordpress.com internet service providers in unfairly and criminally suspending two of the Claimant's Blogs https://shantanup.wordpress.com and

(q) Framing false allegations of harassment and stalking by me against Katrina Sale, BP, IOPC, educational establishments, staff of BLM Law that it knew I had nothing to do with and that it was organised by the State Security Services within the UK and in the United States of America; false arrest and confiscation of our family computer and Mobile Phone devices: £1,000,000;

(r) protecting criminals of BP, ASDA, Sainsburys, Moto and Tesco for denying me employment unfairly: £1,000,000;

(s) protecting Lulu Publishing that disabled my book publishing programme of ‘The Allurement of Reality without giving me a chance to rectify any errors that it found questionable on the 88 eBooks and print books: £1,000,000;

(t) protecting PAYPAL, Santander Bank and Barclays Bank for fraudulent activities on my Bank Account: £500,000;

(u) protecting the Samaritans, Charity Commission and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman for covering up the hate crimes by Victims of Panigrahi Association (VOPA), a unit of the Security Services: £1,000,0000;

(v) protecting Stripe Payments (UK) for deceitful and duplicitous dealings to withhold banking support to VishistaAdvaitaSampradaya(TCLS/TCLP-UK) of my Company The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited: £1,000,000;

(w) protecting the Tech Giants LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook of terroristic harassment on me over several years: £1,000,000;

(x) protecting Wix.com Internet Website Company that discredited and defamed me without an explanation by disabling my website https://knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com £2,000,000; and

(y) protecting JONATHAN BRADLEY, Sole practice law practice, for inflicting terroristic attack on me by email that required immediate investigation by Kent Police: £1,000,000.

(z) refusal to investigate the matter of the criminal manipulation of the Claimant’s petitions to the House of Commons Petition Committee (£1,000,000)


Summary of Claim Amount:


The total amount claimed from United Kingdom Treasury for damages listed above is the tip of the iceberg: with the continued terrorism suffered by the Claimant the monetary value of the compensation Claim cannot be measured, but the Claimant now submits that £300 million is justified.

(Signed)

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

07.33 am (UK-Time) 10 December 2024

____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your email

Inbox

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:57

subject: Thank you for your email

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important according to Google magic.

Find out how you can get in touch

Read this email online

Santander logo

Thank you for your email

This is an automated response as we don't monitor this email account.

Here are the different ways you can contact us:

Personal

Call us

Branch

Santander Select

Call us

Santander Business

Call us

Branch

Santander Private Banking

Call us

Your security is our priority

So you know that an email is genuinely from us, we'll:

Address it to you personally.

Include the last 4 digits of your account or card number, or the last 3 characters of your postcode.

Never ask you to log on to Online or Mobile Banking through a link.

Never ask for your personal information, such as passwords or security details.

If you get an email that's suspicious or doesn't follow the rules above then please forward it to phishing@santander.co.uk

Protect yourself against fraud and scams

Never share a Santander One Time Passcode (OTP) with another person. Not even a Santander employee.

Never move your money to a new account for security reasons. If you’re asked to do this, it will be a scam.

Never take things at face value. Criminals pretend to be people you trust. Always make sure you really know who you’re talking to.

Our Fraud and security page has more information on how you can protect yourself and your money.

Santander UK plc. Registered Office: 2 Triton Square, Regent’s Place, London, NW1 3AN, United Kingdom. Registered Number 2294747. Registered in England and Wales. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Our Financial Services Register number is 106054. You can check this on the Financial Services Register by visiting the FCA’s website www.fca.org.uk/register. Santander and the flame logo are registered trademarks.

ACRM 3726 MAR 19

____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your enquiry to the Legal Ombudsman

Inbox

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:57

subject: Thank you for your enquiry to the Legal Ombudsman

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important according to Google magic.

Legal Ombudsman

Thank you for your email

We are currently dealing with a high volume of enquiries.

If you already have a case with us, we will add your email to the file. A colleague will be in touch with you just as soon as they review your email.

If you are contacting us for the first time about a complaint, please be aware that it may take around 10 weeks before you hear from us, and at that stage, we may need to ask you for more information. We thank you for your patience and would like to reassure you that our teams are working very hard to review and respond to your email as quickly as possible.

Once we have confirmed that we have all the information we need, we will write to you to let you know that we have passed your case for formal assessment by an investigator.

Please be aware that there is a considerable wait for a case to be assessed by an investigator, which varies depending on the complexity of the case. More information about the wait times will be included in the letter we send to you at the time the case is added to a queue and can also be found on our website.

If you have concerns about the wait times and feel they may detrimentally impact on you or your case, for example, because of a financial hardship or serious health concern, please let us know.

Have you complained to your service provider?

We can only investigate a complaint once the service provider has had the chance to investigate it and respond. This means you need to make a formal complaint to them first. You can find further information on our website about how to complain to your service provider, including a template complaint letter.

How to complain to us

If you have already complained to your service provider and have not received a satisfactory response, then we might be able to help. The easiest way to check if we can help you is to use our complaint checker tool on our website. Alternatively, you can send us a completed complaint form, which is available to download from our website.

We will need your completed complaint form, along with a copy of your complaint to the service provider and copies of any responses you have received from them. Please only send us copies and not original documents.

You should be aware that we are also unable to accept documents from an online document storage facility such as Dropbox.

Do not send us any other information until we request it.

If you need to write to us, our address is:

Legal Ombudsman

PO Box 6167

SLOUGH

SL1 0EH

Our telephone number is 0300 555 0333. We are open from 9am to 4pm from Monday to Friday. Calls may be recorded and used for training and monitoring purposes.

Have we let you know we have passed your case for assessment?

If we have already let you know your case is awaiting assessment by an investigator, you do not need to do anything further at this stage. An investigator will contact you when they start working on the complaint. Please note that you may be waiting a considerable time before your case will be passed to an investigator. The letter we have sent to you should provide you with more specific information about these timescales. We will provide updates every three months.

Supporting you in making a complaint

You can find out more about how we work and how we can help you by visiting our website (www.legalombudsman.org.uk). Here you will find a copy of our complaint form and information about how to complain, along with useful factsheets.

We are committed to making sure the way we work does not put you at a disadvantage so in addition to our legal duty to provide reasonable adjustments for disabled people, if you need any help or support, please tell us about it and we will do our best to meet your needs. We also understand that your circumstances might change, along with the support that you need, so please let us know at any time and we will consider your request.

If you are requesting personal data under Freedom of Information or the Environmental Information Regulations or would like a copy of personal data under Data Protection please email infosec@legalombudsman.org.uk

Visit our website to find out how we use your personal data.

For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice. www.legalombudsman.org.uk/privacy This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Legal Ombudsman does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Legal Ombudsman for operational or business reasons. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Legal Ombudsman does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Legal Ombudsman for operational or business reasons.

____________________________________________________________________

CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Inbox

from: Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:58

subject: RE: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

mailed-by: justice.gov.uk

Signed by: justice.gov.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important because previous messages in the conversation were important.Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Inbox

from: Stripe <no-reply@stripe.com>

reply-to: Stripe <no-reply@stripe.com>

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:57

subject: Re: Fwd: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Signed by: stripe.com

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important according to Google magic.

We recently received a Stripe support request from shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com. In order to provide you with the best possible support, we’ll need you to log in to your account and confirm that it was you who sent the request:

Confirm support request

If you’re not able to log in to your account, you can ignore this message and wait for our reply - we’ll be in touch shortly.

If you did not send us a support message recently, please let us know immediately. Simply click the Contact support link at support.stripe.com to get in touch.

While you’re waiting to hear back, take a look at these articles which may help answer your question.

Help

Add a bank account for payouts

Help

Not receiving email sent from Stripe

Help

Late or missing payouts

Find more articles like these on our support site.

In future, you can also contact us directly from our support site to avoid having to confirm your emails.

Read more about why we ask you to confirm your support request.

Stripe, 354 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Francisco, CA 94080

Need to refer to this message? Use this ID: em_zk3oh7e6dfwq3jcpk7puh9tk5d6wkh

*Mr Justice Keith of the Administrative Court passed an Order dated 3 July

2002 that permission to apply for Judicial Review is hereby refused because

'despite being required to lodge with the Administrative Court a statement

setting out the basis on which the Claimant alleges that these decisions

are amenable to judicial review and why permission to challenge them should

be granted, no such statement has been lodged. There is therefore no basis

on which permission to proceed with the claim for judicial review can be

granted. In addition, now that the decisions which the Claimant wishes to

challenge are known, it is plain that this application for permission to

proceed by way of judicial review is out of time.' I wrote backunder Notice

for renewal of claim for permission to apply for judicial review that,

'With due regard to the judgement made, not all the decisions which the

Claimant wishes to challenge were available to me until now. The attached

document is still underconsideration at Lewes Appeal Centre. This

application for Judicial Review to prevent the further perverting of the

course of justice is therefore not out of time. On 5 August 2002 the

Administrative Court wrote that the permission application has been listed

for oral hearing on 20 August 2002. I wrote back asking who the other

parties are for the Hearing and the Court Room and Time, but no reply was

received. On 23 August 2002 Mr Justice Collins of the Administrative Court

passed an Order under notification of the Court's decision following an

oral hearing on the renewed application for permission to apply for

Judicial Review that permission be refused: no attendance from either

parties.*

2. I have requested the Administrative Court for another listing of the

Case as follows:

*FINAL DIRECTIONS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL ON CA-2023-000750: ITS

IMPLICATIONSfrom: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com

<shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>>to: Civil Appeals - Registry

23:29subject: FINAL DIRECTIONS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL ON CA-2023-000750:

ITS IMPLICATIONS*

I trust that Wordpress will find this correspondence self-explanatory.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 05:08, Biswabhusan Panda <jharaphula.ads@gmail.com>

wrote: Re: best WP Sidebar widgets ever | Google + On-page SEO friendly

> Friends,

>

> After a successful installation you don’t need to do anything, this

> WordPress plugin “*i20 Sidebar Widgets*” will automatically fit in your

> theme.

>

> Download*

>

> Using Settings, you can Set the number of records you want to show or

> border and height of these Sidebar Widgets. By default the plugin Comes

> with 100% width. You can use this in page Header, Side bar or inside

> Paragraphs. Currently we are supporting 28 popular Categories with more

> than each of 400+ of high quality Articles. Depending upon your niche from

> plugin settings you can select which Categories Articles you need to display

> in your PHP/WordPress blogs Sidebar

>

> These Widgets are completely dynamic *(fetching DATA from SSD Storage xml

> feeds)*. Make Sure in every page refresh for 90% cases these Widgets will

> show new records to the end-user.

>

> You can display these Sidebar Widgets using Shortcode

> [i20_Sidebar_Widgets].

>

>

>

>

>

> --

> Donate us a little*

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> --

> Thanks for your precious time for reading my letter.

>

> Regards,

> Biswabhusan Panda

> CEO n Founder

> JHARAPHULA, Kanan Vihar, Bhubaneswar

> WhatsApp +919096266548 <https://wa.me/919096266548>

____________________________________________________________________

I pressed ‘Confirm Support Request’, and the following message came up with a tick mark and ‘Close’

Support message verified

We verified your identity for this support message. We should be in touch soon!

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic reply: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Inbox

from: Phso Enquiries <Phso.Enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:57

subject: Automatic reply: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Signed by: ombudsman.org.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important according to Google magic.

This is an automated response to confirm we have received your email.

Please read the section which relates to why you have contacted us.

You are bringing or have a complaint with us.

If you are bringing a complaint to us and this is your first contact:

We are sorry that you have had reason to contact us. The best way to submit your complaint to us is to complete our complaint form. You can complete the complaint form online, or you can get copies of our Parliamentary and Health forms (including large print format) on our website.

If you are unsure if your complaint is ready for us to look at, you can find out more on our website.

If you need a different format such as a different language or Braille, or if you need any further support to help you get your complaint to us, you can call us on 0345 015 4033. We can also provide paper copies of the forms. Our opening hours are Monday to Thursday 9am to 4pm, Friday 8.30am to 12pm

2. If you have an existing case with us:

Your email will be added to your case and your caseworker will usually be in contact with you within 15 working days.

3. If you are making an FOI request:

Please resend your email to informationrights@ombudsman.org.uk.

You are contacting us from an organisation or MP's office:

If you are providing records or a response to enquiries on a case, your email will be added to the case and if necessary, the caseworker will be in contact with you.

If you have a general query, you will be responded to within 15 working days.

If you are emailing about any of the following, please redirect your email:

...

[Message clipped] View entire message

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic reply: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

from: maidstonecrowncourt <maidstonecrowncourt@justice.gov.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 14 Dec 2024, 09:58

subject: Automatic reply: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002

Signed by: justice.gov.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important because previous messages in the conversation were important.

Thank you for your email which has been received by Maidstone Crown Court. Please do not telephone the court to confirm receipt.

(This inbox is monitored between 9am to 5pm)

If you have been allocated a case number, to enable us to link your email with your file, please include the case number in the subject line of all future emails.

For future emails please include one of the following headings in the subject field for this to be filtered into the correct sub folder.

Listing: Listings or List office .

Applications: Special Measures, Live Link, Bail Variations, Breach Summons, Confiscation, POCA, Legal Aid, Live Link, Restraining Order.

Case Progression: Case Progression, CPO, Tram.

Cases listed to be listed within a week: Priority.

Jury enquiries- Jury OR Juror.

The Listing Team is currently working on the backlog of cases and a date will be provided in due course

Any requests for hearings to be heard via CVP must be received before 1:30pm the day before the date set for hearing.

Any requests for changes to the list must be made before 2:30pm the day before the hearing.

Bail application need to be sent to the court before 48 hours the variation is concerned, unless its an emergency.

General court information, including opening hours and building facilities, is accessible from the Court and Tribunal finder website – Maidstone Combined Court Centre - Find a Court or Tribunal - GOV.UK (find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk)

Please Note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable you give legal advice.

Standard bail application/variations to be heard before Christmas need to be received by the Court by close of business on 19th December. If the application is not received by this date, there is no guarantee that the application will be processed by 24th December.

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

...

[Message clipped] View entire message


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Daily Bulletin

Subscribe for Updates From NWS Online Conference

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by NWS. Proudly created with wix.com

bottom of page