CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002
Inbox
Shantanu Panigrahi
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>
date: 14 Dec 2024, 10:01
subject: Re: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002
mailed-by: gmail.com
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 09:56, Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Stripe
Following the failure to have this Dispute elicited at Medway County Court, Central London County Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, East Kent Magistrates Court, Medway Magistrates Court, Maidstone Crown Court, this morning I have considered that this matter is absolutely ripe and amenable to a Judicial Review which is what the Administrative Court of the Royal Courts of Justice is charged with the responsibility to conduct.
From my preliminary correspondence with the Administrative Court as set out below it is under a Case Progression state of proceedings, whereby I am required to produce a statement to the Court of what precisely should be Judicially Reviewed by the Justices.
My contention is that I have been victimised by an organisation allied to the University of Greenwich under the guise of calling itself 'Victim of Panigrahi Association' to brutalise and terrorise me and thwart my innocent quest to build a new life for myself and my family in the United Kingdom after being unceremoniously dismissed from service without the payment of my due entitlement to severance pay.
Over the past 4 years I worked Freelance from home to develop my concept of The Conservative Libertarian Society under my company 'The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited' and its political offshoot The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom (TCLP-UK) and Stripe was the lynch institution fronting the disruption of my business by placing it on a Restricted Access unable to recruit members directly by processing the payments to my business Accout at Tide Bank. Stripe has given me no reason why it has taken this stance.
The House of Commons petition Committee especially changed my TCLP-UK Petition that was duly sponsored with 5 signatures into a completely watered down version that lost the substance and meaning of what we had envisaged.
The details of the terrorism inflicted on me are already in your possession but I attach another copy hereby: Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police).pdf.
A preliminary list ot parties that are required to attend any Hearing announced by the Administrative Court are accordingly copied into this email but the final list will have to be announced by the Administrative Court Justices.
Should anyone copied into this email have any questions, I am available to provided further clarifications or an out of court settlement of the damages and compensation and apology package of £300 million.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 08:42
Subject: CASE PROGRESSION Case No CO/1680/2002
To: Biswabhusan Panda <jharaphula.ads@gmail.com>
Dear Mr Biswabhusan Panda
1. Draw your attention to proceedings at the Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice that dates back as follows:
Mr Justice Keith of the Administrative Court passed an Order dated 3 July 2002 that permission to apply for Judicial Review is hereby refused because 'despite being required to lodge with the Administrative Court a statement setting out the basis on which the Claimant alleges that these decisions are amenable to judicial review and why permission to challenge them should be granted, no such statement has been lodged. There is therefore no basis on which permission to proceed with the claim for judicial review can be granted. In addition, now that the decisions which the Claimant wishes to challenge are known, it is plain that this application for permission to proceed by way of judicial review is out of time.' I wrote back under Notice for renewal of claim for permission to apply for judicial review that, 'With due regard to the judgement made, not all the decisions which the Claimant wishes to challenge were available to me until now. The attached document is still under consideration at Lewes Appeal Centre. This application for Judicial Review to prevent the further perverting of the course of justice is therefore not out of time. On 5 August 2002 the Administrative Court wrote that the permission application has been listed for oral hearing on 20 August 2002. I wrote back asking who the other parties are for the Hearing and the Court Room and Time, but no reply was received. On 23 August 2002 Mr Justice Collins of the Administrative Court passed an Order under notification of the Court's decision following an oral hearing on the renewed application for permission to apply for Judicial Review that permission be refused: no attendance from either parties.
2. I have requested the Administrative Court for another listing of the Case as follows:
FINAL DIRECTIONS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL ON CA-2023-000750: ITS IMPLICATIONS
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
date: 13 Dec 2024, 23:29
subject: FINAL DIRECTIONS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL ON CA-2023-000750: ITS IMPLICATIONS
I trust that Wordpress will find this correspondence self-explanatory.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 05:08, Biswabhusan Panda <jharaphula.ads@gmail.com> wrote: Re: best WP Sidebar widgets ever | Google + On-page SEO friendly
Friends,
After a successful installation you don’t need to do anything, this WordPress plugin “i20 Sidebar Widgets” will automatically fit in your theme.
Official Link https://wordpress.org/plugins/i20-sidebar-widgets/ | Free Download
Using Settings, you can Set the number of records you want to show or border and height of these Sidebar Widgets. By default the plugin Comes with 100% width. You can use this in page Header, Side bar or inside Paragraphs. Currently we are supporting 28 popular Categories with more than each of 400+ of high quality Articles. Depending upon your niche from plugin settings you can select which Categories Articles you need to display in your PHP/WordPress blogs Sidebar.
These Widgets are completely dynamic (fetching DATA from SSD Storage xml feeds). Make Sure in every page refresh for 90% cases these Widgets will show new records to the end-user.
You can display these Sidebar Widgets using Shortcode [i20_Sidebar_Widgets].
--
* Donate us a little
--
Thanks for your precious time for reading my letter.
Regards,
Biswabhusan Panda
CEO n Founder
JHARAPHULA, Kanan Vihar, Bhubaneswar
WhatsApp +919096266548
____________________________________________________________________
Auto-Reply
Inbox
from: KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 14 Dec 2024, 10:01
subject: Auto-Reply
mailed-by: justice.gov.uk
Signed by: justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Comments