E35YM660 Central London County Court/CA-2023-000750 Court of Appeal
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: cambonfrance@yahoo.com
date: 10 Jul 2023, 13:18
subject: E35YM660 CentralLomdonCountyCourt/CA-2023-000750 Court of Appeal
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Mr Cambon
If it was you who sent me the following text, kindly identify yourself with your full address and the case on which you are seeking information, if it is not the following for you have misspelt Judge Leightman(?) I only know of Judge Lightman who is a District Judge as follows:
I am ready to share my information concerning Judge Lightman and the proceedings pending under Appeal at the Court of Appeal against his judgment of 21 June 2021 under the Case of the subject title named above.
The Judgment in question from District Judge Lightman is attached, as well as the complicated Appeal at the Court of Appeal for your initial response:
CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf; ToCourtofAppealviaCivilAppealsRegistry(CA-2003-000750)10Jul2023.
Please let me know the full story of your case against the alleged corrupt conduct of District Judge Lightman's or Leightman's case between your neighbour and you and the name of the Court institution involved. From my case. HHJ Parfitt passed an Order in January 2021 as attached: CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_received byClaimantat9.27amon22March2021.pdf.
It was all a very fishy set up, first the delay in me receiving HHJ Parfit's Order and then being told that the Hearing was for a Pre-Trial purpose and instead of the Appeal going to a Circuit Judge it was given to a District Judge to assess costs rather then the full merits of my Claim for millions in damages and compensation that the Circuit Judge was obliged to consider. These facts caused me so much concern as if I was being lined up for criminal proceedings under Dristrict Judge's supervision that I did not attend the appointment of 21 June 2021 by telephone Hearing BTMeet and let the Counsel for the Defendant argue the matter and come to some expectant prejudiced decision against me as Claimant which I would have the opportunity to appeal at the Court of Appeal, and which I did but it then directed me back to a Circuit Judge at the Central London County Court itself. I had paid the £4170 costs awarded to the Prime Minister of the day under duress immediately so as not to face fines. As it happened, the Appeal to the Circuit Judge was finally listed for a Hearing on 20 January 2023 as attached: Central London County Court NOTICE OF HEARING OF A.PPLICATION).pdf, which with the timing and other factors that I started probing out clearly pointed it out as being a Poisoned Chalice on me; it was then adjourned on the morning of the day of the Hearing from an email that I received from Jessica Da Costa for the Government Legal Department. but the Central London County Court did not write to me directly with this information despite tens of emails that I sent the Court asking for an update.
So I appealed to the Court of Appeal and am awaiting it's response.
Kind regards
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
Forwarded from text received from 07717 097070 on 07967789619 at 12.30 pm 10 July 2023
Hello! I have been reading, regarding your problem with judge Leightman. He had presided over my case with my neighbour, who had committed several wrongs (Torts) against me. I find him to be completely, and utterly corrupted.
I wonder if it will be possible to communicate (copare notes) I will really appreciate it if this was possible. My email address is cambonfrance@yahoo.com
Kind regards
F Cambon
4
Attachments
• Scanned by Gmail
CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf; ToCourtofAppealviaCivilAppealsRegistry(CA-2003-000750)10Jul2023
CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_received byClaimantat9.27amon22March2021.pdf.
Central London County Court NOTICE OF HEARING OF A.PPLICATION).pdf
(a)
General Form of Judgment or Order
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date 21 June 2021
(The County Court Sealed)
173
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019
Before District Judge Lightman sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. It is recorded that:
(a). The Court has sought to join the Claimant in the BT Meet Me hearing listed for today at 11.40 am. The Court telephoned at least thrice the Claimant on the telephone number given by him in his application dated 19 June 2021 as 07967789619 but the telephone was not picked up.
(b) The application dated 19 June 2021 of the Claimant to adjourn be refused.
(c) Today’s hearing is merely to assess costs. The District Judge today has no other jurisdiction.
2. The Claim Form having been struck out, judgment for the Defendant.
3. Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs assessed in total as £4,170 payable by 4 pm on 5 July
2021.
Dated 21 June 2021
____________________________________________________________________
The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim
Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.
N1 General Form of Judgment or Order
Produced by S. Mirza
CJR 005C
(b)
CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
date: 10 Jul 2023, 08:35
subject: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
mailed-by: gmail.com
Contact the court
Civil Appeals Office Registry
Room E307
3rd Floor East Block
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
Map and directions
Monday to Friday, 10am to 4:30pm
Telephone: 020 7947 7121
Text phone: 18001 020 7947 7121
Email: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk
Dear Sir/Madam
1. My communications to the Court of Appeal in respect of the above Case Reference Number was returned this morning undelivered for I seem to have used an old email address to send it to.
2. If there are any outstanding proceedings on this Appeal at the Court of Appeal given the lack of Directions from the North Kent Magistrates Court on the attached update submitted this morning: ToNorthKentMagCrt(Defendant'MigigatingFactorUpdate)10July2023.docx, kindly reply to this email.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
One attachment
• Scanned by Gmail
ToNorthKentMagCrt(Defendant'MigigatingFactorUpdate)10July2023.docx:
Defendant's Mitigating Factor for Trial Hearing of 10 November 2023 2 pm: an Update
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>
date: 10 Jul 2023, 06:54
subject: Defendant's Mitigating Factor for Trial Hearing of 10 November 2023 2 pm: an Update
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
Magistrates
North Kent Magistrates Court
sitting at Medway Magistrates Court
Your Honour
The absence of a reply from Kent Police over this weekend to the communication sent as linked here Is All Well? (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/is-all-well is highly regrettable, as it appears that there is no option in resolution of this matter ahead of the 10 November 2023 2 pm Hearing date attached (LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov_2pm).pdf) that I was keen to avoid for the fact that it would lead to unnecessary costs both in terms of Court time and the various parties to the dispute.
Kent Police arrested me on four occasions over the past year and a half and coerced me into a fifth interview at the Police Station as well as seizing our computers and associated IT devices without any justification from my point of view and its reluctance to discuss the matter is indicative of some other forces who may have been involved in terrorising me and my family for the past 5-6 years especially.
Yesterday I had a conversation with my psychotherapist Jill Jesson on WhatsApp which effectively summarised my updated analysis of what has transpired, as attached for your kind consideration: PROGRESSING INTO THE FUTURE-digital.pdf.
I hope to receive the Direction of the Court in light of these updated assessments.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
2
Attachments
• Scanned by Gmail:
(a) LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov_2pm).pdf
(b) PROGRESSING INTO THE FUTURE-digital.pdf.
(a)
North Kent Magistrates’ Court (1966)
Sitting at Medway Magistrates Court
ALL ENQUIRIES: PO BOX CH4, The Courthouse, The Brook, Chatham, ME4 4JZ
Tel: 01634 830232, Fas: 0870 324 0037 Email: northkent@justice.gov.uk
Office Opening Hours: 9.00am to 5pm, Monday to Friday
____________________________________________________________________
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI
3 HOATH LANE
WIGMORE
GILLINGHAM
KENT ME8 0SL
[Received: 11.30 am 7 June 2023]
Case number: 0462300074226
Born: 8 August 1957
URN: 46SJ1327123
Summons on Referral to Court
A magistrate has decided that your case should be referred to a full court hearing
On 10 November 2023 at 2.00 pm
At Medway Magistrates’ Court
The Courthouse, PO Box CH4, The Brook, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4JZ (telephone 01634 830232).
Reason
For trial
Attendance
If you attend court, you must arrive 30 minutes before the time shown above. A listing time is not a guaranteed hearing time. You may be required to wait.
Warning
If you do not attend, the court may still deal with the case in your absence. If the court does not have up to date information about your financial circumstances you maybe ordered to pay a fine that is more than you can afford.
Date: 1 June 2023
Cases
Charge initiated by: Chief Constable KENT POLICE of Medway Police Station, Pursers Way, Eastbridge, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 1NE
462300074226/1 Date of Charge: 05/04/2023
Prosecutor Reference: 2300XX0000000004742D
On 05/10/2022 at Boxley om the county of Kent drove a motor vehicle, namely a FORD FIESTA TITANIUM TURBO – 5 DOOR SALOON Index GH17AZZW, on a road, namely A229 Chatham Road, subject to a local traffic order, namely The Kent Council (Various Roads, Maidstone) (Speed Limits) (Consolidation)Order 2020, at a speed exceeding 50 miles per hour.
Contrary to the above local traffic Order and sections 84 and 89(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Schedule 2 to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.
The sentence for this offence can be endorsed on your driving record
____________________________________________________________________
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI 2 June 2023/SUMRTC_47_0/8298/1
North Kent Magistrates’s Court
Code 1966
____________________________________________________________________
Referral to Full Court Hearing
Your case was considered by the court under the single justice procedure. However, owing to the reasons given, your case has now been referred to a hearing before a full magistrates’ court. For information on the reason, see below.
For trial
At the next hearing, the magistrates will receive evidence either in the form of written statements or from any witnesses that attends court. You must attend, and bring with you any witness that you will call to give evidence on your behalf. If you do not agree with any statement being read to the court, you must inform the prosecution immediately.
Advice and help
If you need advice on what to do you should get help from a lawyer or advice agency at once. If you cannot afford a lawyer, you may be able to get free advice about your case. For more information see
www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/criminal/
Do not wait until you come to court.
If you need any general help about this summons contact the court office. PLEASE NOTE: Court staff are not able to give you specific advice on how to respond to the allegation.
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI 2 June 2023/SUMRTC_47_0/8298/1
(b)
PROGRESSING INTO THE FUTURE
Author: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Publisher: The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited
Companies House Number 13489581
ISBN Number: 978-1-915668-92-9
PREFACE
DAILY DEVELOPMENTS
Shantanu Panigrahi
@ShantanuPanigr8
·
4h
Jeremy Hunt denied bank account because of 'disproportionate' money laundering rules
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/jeremy-hunt-denied-bank-account-because-of-disproportionate-money-laundering-rules/ar-AA1dBOFZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e73843630a894e83b64bdf20a97be96e&ei=10
____________________________________________________________________
Shantanu Panigrahi shared a memory.
28m ·
Shared with Public
3 years ago
See your memories
Shantanu Panigrahi
9 July 2020 ·
Shared with Public
Struggle for liberty is an ancient Hindu aim, and theories have been put forward since time immemorial: it alleviates suffering.
____________________________________________________________________
Pinned post
Shantanu Panigrahi shared a memory.
39 m ·
Shared with Public
I am now a Vishista-advaiist not Brahmoadvaitist. A Vishista-advaitist reveres God but lives aloof from God focussing instead on à special kind of dharmayudha, namely to seek the truth, expose the truth and accommodate oneself ih the reality so-determined.
Advaita means being at one with reality in material and spiritual dimensions but it is a continuous process of immersing oneself in Brahma-Nature which is a dynamic system of impermanence. When perfected by losing all one’s attachments one reacts spontaneously, nonchalantly and unpremeditatedly to the imminent reality so is liberated.
3 years ago
See your memories
Shantanu Panigrahi
9 July 2020 ·
Shared with Public
In Brahmoadvaita that believes in pre-ordination and preorchestration union with Brahma submits to the philosophy of letting Providence decide one's fate because from guna transcendence completely to shed of all jivaatman's attachments finally one goes with the flow of events and incidents. If there is to be liberty on the horizon that is all well and good for it will take away all the human beings uncertainties in living that cause mental suffering. One has no aims and one accepts one's fate as pre-ordained so there is no one to blame for the ups and downs during one's life. It is just how it was all meant to be.
https://www.knowledgeforworldconservation.com/post/divine-providence
____________________________________________________________________
10.39 am (UK-Time) 9 July 2023
Update:
Tweeted, facebooked in Vishista Advaita Sampradaya Page of Facebook and posted it in LinkedIn.
Then soon afterwards sent the tweet by sharing it on WhatsApp with Amulya Nayak, family and Jill Jesson:
Jill Jesson replied at 12.01 pm on Whats App text: ‘ I agree 90 % with this. But fee that even though life is fated, we have to learn to take responsibility for our wrong doings and put right them too, to enable us to raise our consciousness in the evolution of the soul’
I rapidly and unpremeditatedly as usual texted back ‘Yes mine is a tentative hypothesis. I always subject myself to the arm of the law to tell me where I have gone wrong in my dealings with society for I have taken out litigations and private prosecutions that I regret now that I realise how the Constitution functions here in the United Kingdom. It took the better part of 26 years to see the mistakes I made with my approach to life. It is a mental disorder that created the paranoid schizophrenia and persistent delusions when the State reacted by sectioning me into the mental hospital twice, and tried to have me put away in more stringent mental treatments irreversibly so when that failed the State tried have me declared stateless. The the State engineered malicious emails through Cyber attacks and go me arrested by Kent Police into a kangaroo court at North Kent Magistrates Court in order to incarcerate me in a prison cell.
My mind was split opened to the reality that I have no proof scientifically of even the existence of God let alone the delusions of grandeur that I was fated to survive freely in the United Kingdom no matter the terrorism mounted by the secretive monarchical Establishment on me.
I got no damages and compensation from Kent Police for the four false arrests of myself in the past year and a half let alone the $55000 owed to me by the University of Greenwich and the £4170 owed to me by the Cabinet Office.
So Jill all theories can be explored by Scientists, Diving Providence is nothing new that anyone can be proud of for having invented or endorsed, is it Jill?’
Jill texted at 13.30 ‘Correct’.
Me to Jill Jesson: We are very busy next two weeks buying a car and going to Broadstairs for a holiday to celebrate my wife’s birthday. When afterwards things are settled perhaps it would be good to discuss how much more counselling I would benefit from a Session on Zoom.’
Jill: ‘Ok. Enjoy Broadstairs’.
____________________________________________________________________
Last Updated: 15.41 pm (UK-Time) 9 July 2023
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic Response
Inbox
from: northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 10 Jul 2023, 06:55
subject: Automatic Response
mailed-by: justice.gov.uk
Signed by: justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
(c)
General Form of Judgment or Order
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date 19 January 2021
(The County Court Sealed)
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019
Before His Honour Judge Parfitt sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
On the Court hearing the Appellant but the Appellant withdrawing from the telephone hearing after making his submission and on the Appellant’s request to reconsider the permission to appeal refused by HHJ Letham by Order dated 30 September 2019
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The request to reconsider permission is refused.
2. The Appellant;s application was totally without merit: the DDJ’s Order was wholly appropriate as a case management order and the stated grounds of appeal that the
Appellant lacked access to legal advice was hopeless and the oral argument put forward that the DDJ was a liar acting as part of a conspiracy to silence the Appellant was absurd (both in its premise and in its substance – since the order under appeal gave the Appellant a final chance to make his particulars of claim good).
3. The Respondent’s application for costs of the action must be referred to a DJ pursuant to CPR 3.5 (2)(a) and the Respondent’s letter dated 13 January 2021 and two cost schedules contained in the Appeal bundle (in pdf format) shall be treated as application in that respect.
4. The Respondent’s costs of the appeal are to be treated as Respondent’s costs in the action.
Dated 19 January 2021
In compliance with GDPR requirements the privacy notice sets out the standards that you can expect from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) when we process personal data about you in the context of civil court proceedings; how you can get access to a copy of your personal data; and what you can do ir you think standards are not being met. Please see link below for further information:
____________________________________________________________________The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter#hmcts-privacy-policy Notice of Hearing of Application
(d)
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date: 13 December 2022
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1st Defendant Ref
Z1819776/MMX HO19
The hearing of the claimant’s application dated 23.06.2022 ? (2021?)
Will take place at 10.00 AM on the 20 January 2023 at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
Time Estimate 1 hour IN PERSON before a Circuit Judge
LISTING POLICY: The court’s listing policy is determined by the senior judge and implemented by staff in accordance with his directions. Your case may not be allocated to a judge until the day of the hearing, and may have to wait in the unassigned list until a judge becomes available to hear it. Every effort will be made to ensure that your case is heard at this or another convenient court. If it is not
possible to provide a judge to hear your case, the court and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service will not be responsible for any costs incurred in the absence of any departure from listing policy due to maladministration.
Parties should be aware that this case may be one of several cases that have been listed to commence at this time. This may mean that your case will not be called immediately at the time scheduled, but may be heard later in the day. We will try to ensure that if your case is listed in the moring it is heard by 1 pm and if your case is listed in the afternoon it is heard by 4 pm. In some cicrcumstances it is possible that your hearing could overrun. You and any witnesses should therefore be available until the end of these periods or even later.
If there are special reasons why this is invonvenient you may make a short notice application to a circuit judge to adjourn. Ordinary inconvenience arising from the fact of being in the unassigned list will not be sufficient reason for an adjournment, nor will the fact that both parties agree to an adjournement.
ACCESSIBILITY: Please inform us as soon as possible if you, your witnesses or legal representatives have a physical disability that may affect your attendance at this court. We can make alternative arrangements for the case to be heard in a suitable court room by calling the Customer Service Team on 0300 123 3577.
FILING OF SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND TRIAL BUNDLES: Trial bundles (if applicable) should be lodged no earlier than 3 working days before the trial (unless otherwise ordered). All trial bundles should be . emailing RCJ.DCO@justice.gov.uk , or centrallondoncounty.dco@justice.gov.uk. phoning our Disability Contact Officer 0207 947 6063.
To help us provide the best help and support, you should try to explain how your disability affects you and give as much information as you can. This will help our staff or the judge to consider what you’ll need to do during your case and any help we can provide. Our staff will always talk with you and agree any reasonable adjustments you need.
(TRUNCATED)
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0S
Commentaires